CIVIL CASE RESULTS
Mr. Murphy has been involved with matters ranging from multi-million dollar awards to cases of nominal sums or equitable relief. Having obtained millions of dollars in settlements and judgments, Murphy Law Offices, LLC will aggressively fight for justice concerning your legal matter. Some of these settlements were obtained while at other firms or in connection with other organizations. This list should not be an indication of dollar amounts.
Negligent Misrepresentation Case obtained a $6,000,000 judgment after a two week trial where we alleged the defendants misrepresented the electrical invoices in the surrounding the sale of a business.
Negligence Case settled a negligence case involving a truck company for $3,200,000.
Medical Malpractice case settled a medical malpractice case where plaintiff was improperly diagnosed for $2,200,000.
Medical Malpractice settled a medical malpractice case where plaintiff was improperly diagnosed for $900,000.
Negligence Case settled a negligence case alleging negligent entrustment of a vehicle which resulted in injuries for $760,000.
Condemnation Case obtained a settlement of $780,000 alleging damages resulting from the closing of a curbcut.
Condemnation Case obtained a settlement of $180,000 alleging damages resulting changes in access.
Mr. Murphy spent most of his career defendant government agencies and successfully litigated hundreds of cases which resulted in numerous defense verdicts.
$875,000.00 settlement for a fast food chain that lost a curb cut as a result of a condemnation project after the government made an initial offer of $176,000.00. In this case we successfully got the government appraiser to concede the property suffered substantial damages as a result of the taking.
$280,000.00 judgement in a case where the government made an initial offer of $50,000. In this case the landowner was losing a full functioning commercial business which the believed had no value. In this case, we successfully obtained a judgment which included costs and attorney fees in the amount of $280,000.00.
$225,000.00 judgment in a case where the government made an initial offer of $60,000.00. This case involved a change in access and the placement of a median in front of the property. Here the government took the position the property suffered no damage as a result of the project. However, a jury disagreed and $195,000.00 settlement in where the landowner lost parking space as result of the taking. Here the government ignored this issue and made an initial offer of $50,000.00. We obtained a very favorable result for the client in the eve of trial.
$95,000.00 settlement for adjoining cases which involved a power easement. Here the power company made an initial offer of $20,000.00 which landowner refused. After going through the litigation process, we convinced the condemnor that the property suffered damages as result of the project.
$95,000.00 settlement for adjoining cases where the government offered $13,000.00. This case involved a private residence where the government was taking a substantial portion of the back yard. Here the government initially refused to consider the property suffered damages. However, after going through the litigation process, the company conceded the property suffered damages due to the diminished ability to develop the property.
$25,000.00 settlement for a landowner where the county was paving a road. In this case, the government made no initial offer believing that the benefits of the project outweighed the damages. In this case, we successfully demonstrated landowner should receive just compensation.
This is only a fraction of the cases handled and by me. Every case is different and each case possesses its own value. I am happy to discuss your case and evaluate all aspects with you.
IMPORTANT LEGAL DISCLAIMERS
ALL CONTENT ON THIS WEB SITE IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. ANY INFORMATION PRESENTED ON ANY PAGE ON THIS SITE OR LINKS FROM THIS SITE SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE FORMAL LEGAL ADVICE FROM A LAW FIRM NOR THE FORMATION OF A LAWYER / CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
EVERY CASE IS DIFFERENT. ANY RESULT THAT THE ENDORSED LAWYER OR LAW FIRM MAY ACHIEVE ON BEHALF OF ONE CLIENT IN ONE MATTER DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE SIMILAR RESULTS CAN BE OBTAINED FOR OTHER CLIENTS.